By William D. Gilbride Jr.
In some circumstances, non-signatories to agreements mandating arbitration can be compelled to have their complaints decided in arbitration. This article describes five situations in which a non-signatory to the arbitration agreement may be compelled to arbitrate or be bound by the decision of the arbitrator.
State and Federal Policy Favor Arbitration
The Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) codifies a policy in favor of arbitration over litigation. Similarly, Michigan state policy favors arbitration of claims. The Michigan Court of Appeals has stated: “unless it may be said… that the arbitration clause is not susceptible to an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute, doubts should be resolved in favor of coverage.”
Who Participates is a Matter of Contract
Notwithstanding the public policy favoring arbitration, determining who may be compelled to arbitrate is a matter of contract. Therefore, a duty to arbitrate a dispute “cannot be imposed on a party which was not… a party to the agreement [.]” Section 2 of the FAA preempts state laws invalidating arbitration agreements, but the FAA expressly recognizes that enforceability of an arbitration agreement may be decided on the basis of state contract law. From this authority, various courts have identified five situations in which a party may be bound to arbitrate and/or an arbitration award may be enforced against a non-signatory: incorporation by reference, assumption, agency, veil-piercing/alter ego, and estoppel.
Incorporation by Reference
A non-signatory may be compelled to arbitrate where the non-signatory executes a contract that incorporates by reference the arbitration agreement. The Sixth Circuit has held that incorporation by reference of a subcontract in an insurance bond could bind the signatories of the bond to arbitration of claims based on an arbitration clause in the primary contract.
Assumption
Further, if a non-signatory’s conduct indicates that it assumed the obligation to arbitrate, the non-signatory maybe bound by assumption. The Second Circuit recognized this principle holding that plaintiffs’ “active and voluntary participation” in the arbitration proceedings demonstrated intent to be bound by the arbitration provision at issue, despite the fact that plaintiffs were non-signatories to the agreement containing the duty to arbitrate.
Agency
Non-signatories may also be bound under traditional principles of agency. In a Michigan case, the partners of a law firm executed an agreement requiring mandatory arbitration of claims between the firm and its partners. When plaintiff, a former partner, sued the firm in tort, the plaintiff named individual partners as defendants, but not the firm. The court, applying agency principles, found that the individual partners’ actions were carried out as agents of the firm. Thus, the dispute fell within the scope of the arbitration clause, and the claims alleged against the individual defendants were ordered to be decided in arbitration.
Alter Ego
A non-signatory may be bound to arbitrate where he is determined by the arbitrator to be the alter ego of the signatory, or where the non-signatory may be held liable for the acts of the signatory upon a finding of piercing the corporate veil. In a New York case, respondent Politowski challenged an arbitration award in a case in which it was alleged that Technologic was Politowski’s (the owner’s) alter ego, and therefore the two were jointly liable. Politowski contended that he was not a party to the arbitration agreement, and thus the arbitrator never had jurisdiction over him and he was not bound by the award. The court held that “deciding which issues pertaining to the relationships of the parties are arbitrable should be left to the arbitrators.” Therefore, the arbitrator’s decision that Technologic and Politowski were jointly liable to the claimant was not susceptible to change by the courts, even though Politowski was not a signatory to the arbitration agreement in his individual capacity.
Estoppel
Under an estoppel theory, a signatory may be compelled to arbitrate his claims against a non-signatory when: (1) the signatory must rely on the terms of the agreement in asserting his claims against the non-signatory; or (2) when the signatory raises allegations of “substantially interdependent and concerted misconduct” by both the non-signatory and a signatory. Under the second alternative, the plaintiff in a City of Detroit Police & Fire Retirement Syst. Case was required to arbitrate all of his claims—and his court action dismissed—because he raised allegations of substantially interdependent and concerted misconduct by the defendants, only one of which was party to the agreement to arbitrate. In so holding, the court noted that plaintiff’s claims against the signatory and non-signatory defendants stemmed from the contract containing the arbitration provision. Thus, equity would not permit plaintiff to assert his claims under the contract, but avoid the terms of the agreement to arbitrate disputes.
Conclusion
In the face of strong public policy favoring arbitration and notwithstanding the contractual nature of the process, courts have found legal theories to compel non-signatories to arbitrate.
__________________________________
William D. Gilbride, Jr. is a shareholder in the Detroit office of Abbott Nicholson, P.C. Bill has devoted his professional life to dispute resolution and conducts trials, arbitrations, facilitative mediation and case evaluation services in the metro Detroit area. For citations to the foregoing case law or more information about the scope and enforceability of arbitration agreements, please feel free to contact Bill at wdgilbride@abbottnicholson.com.
__________________________________
This article originally appeared in the family of Detroit Legal News publications on December 29, 2017, and is being reprinted with permission from the publisher.
Our Professionals
* Member Emeritus
Case Studies
repaglinide absorption
The figure s비아그라약국hows the com비아그라약국parison of s비아그라약국pati
cleocin pills – order terramycin online cheap buy chloromycetin paypal
iv protonix
remeron and cymbalta
buy zithromax generic – order ofloxacin sale ciprofloxacin us
The natural 비아그라구매resources of비아그라구매 a nation ar비아그라구매e no
cost of robaxin
out at the s비아그라효능ite as well.비아그라효능 This techno비아그라효능logy
generic stromectol – order doryx generic oral cefaclor
buy ventolin paypal – promethazine ca buy theophylline 400mg pills
mical, easy 비아그라약국to use and c비아그라약국ould be carr비아그라약국ied
repaglinide tablets usp
sitagliptin phosphate 100 mg tablet
buy clarinex 5mg – buy clarinex no prescription ventolin inhalator generic
medrol buy – cheap zyrtec 10mg buy azelastine sprayer
synthroid seasonique
spironolactone 12.5 mg
네이버 아이디 판매 네이버는 다양한 온라인 서비스와 웹사이트를 제공하며, 대한민국을 중심으로 아시아와 기타 지역에서 많은 이용자들에게 서비스를 제공하고 있습니다. 네이버의 주요 서비스 종류는 다음과 같습니다
buy micronase without prescription – cost glipizide 10mg forxiga 10mg for sale
(20 species)비아그라 구매. The Botani비아그라 구매c Garden als비아그라 구매o ha
voltaren (diclofenac potassium) potassium
tizanidine picture
tamsulosin basic 0 4
prandin 1mg cost – buy repaglinide 1mg without prescription jardiance 10mg for sale
비아그라는 처방전이 필요한 약물로 분류되어 있기 때문에, 올바른 절차를 따라 구매해야 합니다. 여기서는 비아그라를 구매하는 올바른 방법에 대해 알아보겠습니다.
비아그라 구매방법
erials. It i비아그라 구매방법s a green pr비아그라 구매방법ocess and is비아그라 구매방법 eco
venlafaxine pregnancy
d severe rus비아그라 구매방법ting. Also, 비아그라 구매방법coated rebar비아그라 구매방법s co
order glucophage 1000mg generic – purchase cozaar generic precose 25mg cost
zetia coupons
zofran dangerous pregnancy
zyprexa recall
ead-Free X-r비아그라 구매 사이트ay Shielding비아그라 구매 사이트 Tiles” was 비아그라 구매 사이트tran
re present t비아그라 구매 사이트hroughout th비아그라 구매 사이트e intestinal비아그라 구매 사이트 tra
brand lamisil – diflucan brand buy griseofulvin pill
exposure to 비아그라 구매 사이트harsh marine비아그라 구매 사이트 environment비아그라 구매 사이트 con
wellbutrin and synthroid
rybelsus order – rybelsus 14mg pills buy DDAVP generic
zofran meclizine
nd preparati비아그라 먹으면 오래하나요on. CSIR Fou비아그라 먹으면 오래하나요rth Paradigm비아그라 먹으면 오래하나요 Ins
antipsychotic zyprexa
to convert t비아그라 먹으면 커지나요he iron-rich비아그라 먹으면 커지나요 red mud int비아그라 먹으면 커지나요o X-
order ketoconazole 200mg online cheap – buy mentax medication sporanox 100 mg over the counter
술이 몸에 미치는 영향과 비아그라의 의도된 효과를 이해함으로써 자신의 성적 경험을 향상시키는 책임감 있는 선택을 할 수 있습니다. 비아그라를 복용하면서 술을 마시는 것을 선택했다면, 적당히 하고 몸의 반응을 염두에 두어야 합니다.
술먹고 비아그라 먹으면
famciclovir where to buy – order generic valaciclovir valaciclovir cheap