Football fairness: Lessons for ADR?

by | Apr 1, 2021 | The ADR Blog | 142 comments

Joe Basta

“It’s not fair!” How many times have mediators and negotiators heard that refrain? Whether from the mouth of the negotiator across the table or the politician seeking higher taxes, everyone wants their “fair share.” But what is ‘”fairness” anyway?
Is there a more subjective, elusive, or slippery word anywhere in the dictionary? Like other perceptions that affect negotiation, fairness is in the mind of the beholder. Yet the concept is not without objective parameters, and periodic review of fairness guidelines might be helpful to ADR providers and consumers before they resort to emotional arguments about “what’s fair.”

“An outcome that appears to be fair may be more important than winning or losing,” observe ADR authors Jay Folberg and Dwight Golann in “Lawyer Negotiation.” Our perception of fairness consists of two components, distributional fairness and procedural fairness. The former is the quantitative outcome – what you get in the negotiation; the latter is the process used to get there – how you were treated. Both provide the foundation for analyzing the fairness of any negotiation.

The most recent and illuminating illustration of the interplay of distributional and procedural fairness comes courtesy of the Baltimore Ravens NFL football team. As Andrew Beaton reported in the Wall Street Journal, the Ravens propose that the NFL abandon the conventional coin toss for starting overtime. Under current rules, when a game goes into overtime, the referee tosses a coin; the winner gets to decide whether they want the ball or choose to defend. The problem is the winner most often chooses the ball because that statistically determines who wins the game. So it turns out the revered coin toss – the gold standard of who goes first, a 50/50 chance – is not so fair after all in this context.

The Ravens propose a “spot and choose” method to eliminate this luck factor. After a coin toss, the winner picks starting field position; then the other team decides if wants to play offense or defense from that spot. Consider this a football variant of how two friends divide a piece of cake: one cuts, the other chooses. Nobel Prize winning economist, Richard Thaler, from the University of Chicago, endorses the Ravens’ proposal as simple, fair, and fun.

You can see why procedural fairness is so important in football: the distributional outcome is win/lose, all or nothing. The procedural process had better be solid because there is no compromise in the result of the distribution. The same logic applies to resorting to trial to determine conflict outcome where negotiation breaks down. The parties accept the legitimacy of a verdict – even one they don’t like because they respect the process that produced it.

Respect for procedural fairness reflects why mediation is a trusted and popular method of dispute resolution. The parties may design their own “spot and choose” method of facilitated negotiation. And even if they choose not to actively design the process, their opportunity to participate in facilitated negotiation with an experienced mediator provides the parties with control and an opportunity to be heard that they would not otherwise have in a trial. Even if the outcome is not exactly as they would have preferred, they are willing to accept and implement it.

Procedural fairness plays a role even where par ties choose to negotiate directly rather than to mediate. Which negotiating style or procedure produces the best outcome? While opinions certainly differ and choice of style depends on personality and the details of the negotiation, the research appears to favor an interest based approach to negotiation over a competitive or adversarial one. Consider your negotiating style carefully; it may well determine your outcome.

Like procedural fairness, distributive fairness too is highly subjective. Impartial and educated observers will often disagree about the fairness of an outcome. Not all conflicts will have the definitive outcome of an NFL football game. But here too benchmarks are available to guide decision-making.

Folberg and Golann suggest four competing principles or rules for determining distributive fairness: equality, need, equity, and generosity. Equality means everyone in a group should share its benefits equally. The need principle dictates those who need more should get more than those who need less. Generosity says one’s outcome should not exceed that of others. Equity links distribution to relative contribution.

The authors apply these principles to a hypothetical joint venture between two individuals, one the creator and sweat equity implementer of the idea and the other who supplies the capital for the enterprise. How do you divide their outcome? Equality will distribute income equally; need will give the poorer negotiator – here the creator – more income. Generosity will result in want the income of neither exceeding the other.
And equity will require determining whose contribution is most valuable.

These distributive fairness guidelines may be considered and applied in any negotiation or mediation, not just the joint venture hypothetical. Choosing among them will depend upon things like the complexity of the case, the relationship between the parties, your degree of self-interest, and cultural norms – whether your social group values individualism over collective benefit for example.

So, the next time someone shouts “it’s not fair,” remember the Baltimore Ravens. There is more to decision-making than a simple coin toss. Some tried and true rules for procedural and distributional fairness may provide helpful guidance.

————————

Joe Basta heads Basta Resolutions PLLC, an Ann Arbor-based firm specializing in mediation and arbitration of commercial and family disputes. He is a former chair of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Section of the State Bar of Michigan. Basta was a trial lawyer for over 34 years at Dykema, litigating complex commercial matters. He teaches negotiation at the Michigan State University College of Law and is a member of Professional Resolution Experts of Michigan Inc. (https://premiadr.com).

Our Professionals

• Laura A. Athens

• Earlene R. Baggett-Hayes

• Joseph C. Basta

• Gene J. Esshaki*

• William D. Gilbride, Jr.

• Lee Hornberger

• Richard L. Hurford

• Michael S. Leib

• Paul F. Monicatti

• Antoinette R. Raheem

• Jerome F. Rock

• Phillip A. Schaedler

• Sheldon J. Stark

• Lisa Taylor

• Martin C. Weisman

• Robert E. L. Wright

  * Member Emeritus

Case Studies

 

 

 

142 Comments

  20. Axqeli on October 10, 2023 at 11:43 pm

    order baclofen 10mg for sale toradol price order toradol 10mg online cheap

  32. Pzuhei on October 30, 2023 at 1:31 am

    ranitidine medication zantac pill generic celebrex 200mg

  35. Jfvofg on November 2, 2023 at 5:04 am

    domperidone 10mg cheap coreg 25mg drug order generic sumycin 500mg

  36. Kqsxvx on November 3, 2023 at 2:36 am

    spironolactone 100mg canada buy valtrex online order proscar 1mg without prescription

  38. Osusat on November 5, 2023 at 12:35 am

    fluconazole 200mg drug forcan us where can i buy cipro

  46. Nhlqlj on November 16, 2023 at 1:24 am

    lamisil usa lamisil drug best online gambling sites

  52. WillieKer on November 18, 2023 at 5:42 pm

    how to buy doxycycline online: buy doxycycline – doxycycline mono

  53. CharlesPoish on November 18, 2023 at 7:41 pm

    medicine in mexico pharmacies: mexican rx online – mexican online pharmacies prescription drugs

  55. CharlesPoish on November 19, 2023 at 12:21 pm

    male erection pills: best pills for ed – cure ed

  57. WillieKer on November 19, 2023 at 4:59 pm

    buy amoxicillin from canada: how to get amoxicillin – where can i get amoxicillin 500 mg

  60. Uslsww on November 20, 2023 at 4:53 am

    order trimox 250mg generic buy arimidex clarithromycin over the counter

  62. Richardmek on November 20, 2023 at 11:01 am

    Vardenafil buy online Generic Levitra 20mg Levitra 10 mg buy online

  69. Richardmek on November 22, 2023 at 11:29 am

    sildenafil 100mg price usa sildenafil 20 mg tablet cheapest sildenafil india

  70. Timothycax on November 22, 2023 at 8:46 pm

    sildenafil tablets india: buy sildenafil us – sildenafil canada cost

  72. Richardmek on November 23, 2023 at 4:04 am

    buy kamagra online usa Kamagra tablets Kamagra 100mg price

  75. Scottnic on November 23, 2023 at 4:40 pm

    amoxicillin 500 mg tablets: buy amoxil – azithromycin amoxicillin

  78. CharlesDof on November 24, 2023 at 12:48 am

    how to get amoxicillin cheap amoxicillin amoxicillin buy online canada

  82. CharlesDof on November 24, 2023 at 6:40 pm

    zestril 20 mg tab buy lisinopril online price for 5 mg lisinopril

  83. Scottnic on November 24, 2023 at 9:47 pm

    cost of generic lisinopril: buy lisinopril – over the counter lisinopril

  84. VernonCoell on November 24, 2023 at 11:02 pm

    where can i buy zithromax in canada: can i buy zithromax online – zithromax prescription online

  87. CharlesDof on November 25, 2023 at 1:00 pm

    doxycycline pharmacy price Buy doxycycline 100mg doxycycline 200 mg pill

  88. Scottnic on November 25, 2023 at 3:21 pm

    zestril 10mg price: buy lisinopril online – price of lisinopril 30 mg

  90. Weipaw on November 26, 2023 at 4:42 am

    letrozole 2.5mg over the counter abilify online buy buy aripiprazole no prescription

  92. CharlesDof on November 26, 2023 at 7:17 am

    amoxicillin without rx amoxil for sale amoxicillin medicine over the counter

  93. Scottnic on November 26, 2023 at 8:08 am

    zithromax 500 mg for sale: zithromax antibiotic – buy cheap generic zithromax

  99. RobertMor on November 27, 2023 at 3:07 pm

    best india pharmacy: online pharmacy india – indianpharmacy com

  100. DanielCax on November 27, 2023 at 6:47 pm

    prescription drugs without prescription Online pharmacy USA canadian pharmacy store

  103. RichardNem on November 28, 2023 at 2:57 am

    pharmacy in canada: safe online pharmacy – northern pharmacy canada

  104. RobertMor on November 28, 2023 at 7:48 am

    prescription drugs without doctor: Top mail order pharmacies – best canadian pharmacy cialis

  108. DanielCax on November 29, 2023 at 12:10 am

    approved canadian online pharmacies cheapest online pharmacy prescription drugs online without

  109. RobertMor on November 29, 2023 at 12:29 am

    reputable mexican pharmacies online: mexico pharmacy – mexico drug stores pharmacies

  111. Michaelmot on November 29, 2023 at 1:50 pm

    buy cheap ventolin online: buy Ventolin inhaler – ventolin albuterol inhaler

  114. Michaelmot on November 30, 2023 at 1:36 am

    paxlovid for sale: Paxlovid buy online – п»їpaxlovid

  130. SonnyTuh on December 3, 2023 at 12:33 pm

    farmacia online piГ№ conveniente: kamagra oral jelly – farmacie online autorizzate elenco

  132. Tracynutty on December 3, 2023 at 4:19 pm

    farmacia online: Cialis senza ricetta – top farmacia online

  135. Tracynutty on December 3, 2023 at 7:49 pm

    acquisto farmaci con ricetta: cialis prezzo – farmacia online senza ricetta

  137. SonnyTuh on December 4, 2023 at 12:54 am

    farmacie online sicure: farmacia online – farmacie online sicure

  139. Tracynutty on December 4, 2023 at 5:10 am

    acquisto farmaci con ricetta: avanafil generico – migliori farmacie online 2023

  141. TerryFielt on December 4, 2023 at 7:32 am

    farmacia online migliore avanafil prezzo migliori farmacie online 2023

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *